How a Mid-Size Manufacturer Reduced Freight Costs by 18%
18%
Annual Freight Cost Reduction
Reduced from 12% to under 1%
Carrier No-Show Rate
Improved from 87% to 96%
On-Time Delivery Rate
Reduced by 15 hours/week
Time Spent Managing Freight
The Challenge
A 200-employee automotive parts manufacturer in the Midwest was spending over $2M annually on freight but had no dedicated logistics team. They relied on 3 different brokers with no rate benchmarking, frequently experienced carrier no-shows, and had zero visibility into shipment status until delivery confirmation.
Our Solution
We consolidated their carrier network under one account with a dedicated dispatcher. By analyzing their lane history, we identified 8 high-volume lanes where contract rates could replace spot market pricing. We implemented carrier vetting standards that eliminated no-shows and provided real-time tracking on every shipment.
The Full Story
This automotive parts manufacturer was a classic case of freight management by committee — purchasing handled some shipments, the plant manager booked others, and nobody benchmarked rates or tracked carrier performance. They were paying spot rates on lanes where contract rates were 15-25% lower, and carrier no-shows disrupted their JIT production schedule multiple times per month.
We started by auditing their 12-month freight spend across all three brokers. The data revealed that 65% of their volume moved on just 8 lanes — Dallas to Detroit, Chicago to Nashville, Indianapolis to Charlotte, and five others. These high-volume lanes were ideal for contract rate negotiations.
After consolidating their freight under one account, we negotiated contract rates on all 8 primary lanes, reducing per-mile costs by an average of $0.35. We also implemented our standard carrier vetting process — FMCSA authority verification, insurance confirmation, CSA score review, and on-time performance tracking — which virtually eliminated carrier no-shows.
The results went beyond cost savings. Their plant manager reclaimed 15 hours per week that had been spent making phone calls and chasing shipment status. Real-time tracking replaced the old system of calling drivers for check-in updates. And the 96% on-time rate meant their JIT production line ran without freight-related shutdowns for the first time in years.
Questions About This Case Study
How long did it take to see results?
Contract rate negotiations took 2-3 weeks. The first month showed a 12% cost reduction. By month 3, the full 18% savings materialized as all lanes transitioned to contract rates and carrier performance stabilized.
Did the manufacturer need to change anything on their end?
The main change was routing all freight requests through our single point of contact instead of calling multiple brokers. This actually simplified their process — one phone number, one dispatcher who knew their lanes and requirements.
What happened to their existing broker relationships?
They consolidated from 3 brokers to us as the primary. We kept one backup broker for overflow capacity during peak periods, but 95%+ of volume flows through our account now.
More Case Studies
Solving Carrier Reliability for a National Distributor
A food and beverage distributor operating 6 regional DCs across the Southeast was experiencing a 15% routing guide failu...
RetailPeak Season Capacity Planning for a Retail Chain
A national specialty retailer with 120+ stores experienced a 300% freight volume spike during Q4 holiday season. Previou...
Food & BeverageCold Chain Compliance for a Food & Beverage Company
A regional food manufacturer shipping fresh produce and dairy products across 8 states was struggling with temperature e...
Want Results Like These?
Tell us about your freight challenges. We'll build a carrier matching strategy that delivers measurable results.